Mazda CX-5… Does It Have Enough Zoom-Zoom In Its DNA?

Mazda Raceway Laguna Seca is one of the oldest, most renowned, and among the most dangerous race tracks on the planet, and this was the place where Mazda chose to launch their latest crossover, the CX-5.

Now why would a car company launch a crossover vehicle at a race track, even if it is the title sponsor of the facility?

Simple, it’s because Mazda believes this new vehicle (which replaces the Tribute from their line-up) is one fine handling vehicle.

Mazda takes their “Zoom-Zoom” slogan very seriously and like to inject fun to drive characteristics on each and every vehicle they produce.

While most people would agree, that the equivalent Mazda is more fun to drive than cars it usually competes against, however their drawback has been fuel-economy.

To address the fuel-consumption issue, Mazda has spent a lot of time and money in recent years, developing a new range of engines, gearboxes and platforms and are calling their new philosophy Skyactiv (it’s not misspelled, there is no “e” at the end).

We first got a taste of this Skyactiv technology in the 2012 Mazda3 GS. However, while that vehicle got the new engine and gearbox, it still was based on an old platform, so hence the full-effect of the Skyactiv technology wasn’t applied.

The CX-5 is the first Mazda to go on sale that has the full Skyactiv package, which begins with the new stiffer, yet lighter platform. Mazda engineers worked hard in shaving off weight while retaining its safety performance. The theory here is, a lighter car not only burns less fuel, but also handles better. Does it work? Keep reading.

<><><><><><><><ADVERTISEMENT: For The Best Deals On New And Used Mazda’s, Visit: Westowne Mazda><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

On the engine front, you get the same 2.0-liter, four-cylinder engine you’ll find under the hood of that Mazda3 GS I spoke about earlier, but now thanks to its ingenious four-into-two-into-one exhaust system (a system too big to put into the old Mazda3 platform), it now produces a little bit more power. Peak power output is 155-hp and 150-lb/ft of torque.

That power can either be fed to just the front-wheels, or to all four wheels in the optional all-wheel drive package (worth an extra $2000). You also get to pick from either the six-speed manual gearbox or the six-speed automatic with Sportshift ($1200 extra).

Having driven both the front-wheel drive version and the all-wheel drive version, with both the manual and automatic gearbox, I’d suggest that the all-wheel drive with the automatic gearbox is worth the extra money. Why? Because while the manual is a decent gearbox, the automatic is just much better suited to this vehicle. As for the argument of front-wheel drive versus all-wheel drive, what I can tell you is that when the vehicle is put into a obstacle avoidance test, the all-wheel drive vehicle is much better at sorting itself out.

However, for most people, the cheaper front-wheel drive version will make more sense and I won’t blame them. Plus, this new platform is very capable and the vehicle feels very much like a car to drive, not some small truck. It’s handling is truly spectacular, no wonder we did most of the testing on a race track.

My only quibble with the handling is to do with the steering feel. Like many modern cars, Mazda has fitted the CX-5 with an electronic power-steering system. Mazda says this system is not only lighter than a conventional hydraulic-based system, but they can also better program the response from the steering. In reality, for the average person it might not make much difference, but for enthusiasts, the new system lacks feedback. However, the now deceased Mazda RX-8 also had electric power-steering, and that had plenty of feel, so more feel can be programmed if the engineers deem it necessary, and I wish they did.

Since I’m quibbling, I would also like to point out that the engine does not feel very willing. It might have 155-hp, but in reality it feels like a lot less. The problem is a lack of grunt in the low-end of the rev range, and that makes the vehicle feel slow. Passing someone on a two-way road requires some planning and perfect execution, because this is no road rocket.

What it is however, is quite a nice place to be in. All the controls seem to be well laid out and the fit and finish looks very good. The seats are nice and comfortable also, although you do need to spend some time finding the right driving position. Depending on your budget, you can have a very basic CX-5 or a fully-loaded model with a Bose sound system and a TomTom developed satellite navigation system. So if you like your gadget’s, you won’t complain much with the CX-5.

You also are not likely to complain much about the looks either. It is an attractive vehicle from all angels. Sure it might not be a break through design, but its not offensive either. If you pay attention, you will find that it has a few clever design touches to liven it up. Has it worked? You be the judge.

If you like what you’re seeing and reading, then you can go to your Mazda dealer now and pick one up for yourself. Starting price for the GX model with front-wheel drive and the manual gearbox is just $22,995. However, the fully loaded GT model with all-wheel drive, automatic and all the gizmos is yours from $33,890. That really is a lot of money for something with just 155-hp. But if speed is not your thing, it might be alright for you. I just hope Mazda’s enthusiastic engineers are working on a Mazdaspeed version to keep the likes of me content.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s